Where would creative writer’s be today without the technologies they so desperately depend on? In the section titled Writing as Technology, taken from Jay David Bolter’s Writing Space: Computer, Hypertext, and the Remediation of Print,
Technology is described in several different ways. I would like to
focus on the technology of the physical tools used to write and their
evolution over time.
With the evolution and development of new
types of paper (from clay tablets to rolls of papyrus; rolls of papyrus
to books of parchment; and parchment to paper) and writing implements
used to put writing on these various canvases, there has also come many
changes in the physical act of writing. However it is important to
remember that, “No technology, not even the apparently autonomous
computer, can ever function as a writing space in the absence of human
writers and readers.” (pg. 17).
One of the things that the
continuous development of new writing technologies has changed is the
magnitude of the audience of a piece of writing. I Tweeted an
interesting idea that struck me while reading this section, and that was
that without the invention of the printing press, the word “Bestseller”
would probably not be applied to a piece of writing. If a creative
writer’s novel was not printed and duplicated by a printing press, then
only one person at a time would be able to read it.
The ambitious
author could go through the tedious act of writing or typing several
copies, but this would take an incredible amount of time and perhaps
only double or triple the number of their audience. Without a printing
press to continuously mass produce your book, you’re writing (assuming
it was well liked enough by a reader to pass their copy along) might not
even make it to the neighboring state.
Carrie Watson
No comments:
Post a Comment